Debates about "bokeh" appear from time to time on all photographic forums, but I don't remember one here so maybe it's time to fix that and raise one On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 07:58 +1000, Peter and Tricia Daley wrote: Bokeh is a Japanese word which refers to how a lens paints out-of-focus. Nowadays digital shooters sometimes apply Gaussian Blur to background (because they can't achieve small enough DOF with their tiny lenses) and think they "added a bokeh", but that's simply not true because Blur is a 2D effect which knows only about array of pixels and doesn't know anything about contents of picture and distance to subject. Lens, by the contrary, works with light from 3D space and takes distance to any point into account. The main reason to use high-speed primes is to shoot wide open to turn distracting and annoying backgrounds into unfocused blur or just to avoid use of artificial lighting. IMHO, if you prefer all-sharp images with great DOF, no much reasons to waste your money and effort with primes: get your favorite zoom, close it to f/8-f/16 and enjoy! You'll not see any visible differences between good zoom and primes at small apertures, so why sacrifice convenience of a zoom?
Some people love big DOF and sharp pictures and they tell bokeh is a bullshit; some people love all-soft pictures and happy with triplets, pinholes and etc; some people prefer benefits of digital cameras with small sensors or use so much digital processing, they just don't care about bokeh. But even if two people agree that bokeh is important, they may argue endlessly which lens gives better bokeh, especially if they are loyal to different lens makers =) UPD:
Tags: Заметки, Фото и видео.
Archives
|