Digital vs. Film

	N9 - Film SLR vs. almost twice more expensive Oly's P&S (5 MP) 2005-06-04 22:06:05 585x749, 192536 bytes film-vs-digital-09.jpg
	N8 - Canon Powershot A85 vs. film SLR Dusk, but I can go on without flash even with ISO 100 film. DOF gets thin, but do I need more of it? 2005-06-04 22:06:15 640x480, 125507 bytes film-vs-digital-08.jpg
	N7 - Canon Powershot A85 vs. film SLR Almost in a full darkness. 2005-06-04 22:06:26 988x625, 290414 bytes film-vs-digital-07.jpg
	N6 - Canon Powershot A85 vs. film SLR OK these two seem to have similar quality at first sight, although the right one has more resolution (print would look better because of more natural color transitions, but that's not visible in screen resolution), more correct exposure and wider dynamic range and I'd like if the left one had a bit smaller DOF... (Just seizing, huh :)) 2005-06-04 22:06:36 1080x768, 464430 bytes film-vs-digital-06.jpg
	N5 - Canon Powershot A85 vs. film SLR You may say it is not correct to compare digital point-and-shoot and SLR, but if they cost about the same - why not? 2005-06-04 22:06:46 926x759, 402709 bytes film-vs-digital-05.jpg
	N4 - SLR (grainy film) vs. cheap P&S vs. prosumer P&S The second frame is a crop of about 1/3 of frame, the others are about 1/6 of full frame. 2005-06-04 22:06:55 1024x620, 257230 bytes film-vs-digital-04.jpg
	N3 - SLR with Yashica 28-80 lens vs. 2 MP Sony digital P&S The crop of about 1/10th of frame area vs. the full frame from the 2 MP digital camera shows much better resolution and reproduction of small details (not saying about color reproduction and lack of digital artefacts), and that's even with shitty print scanning. 2005-06-04 22:06:05 800x677, 241323 bytes film-vs-digital-03.jpg
	N2 - SLR with Yashica 28-80 lens vs. 2 MP digital P&S The crop from film is 4 times smaller than the one from digital (about 1/9 of frame vs. 1/2) The face on the latter hardly resembles reality! 2005-06-04 22:06:13 800x662, 209540 bytes film-vs-digital-02.jpg Comments Анонимно: :-? :-? 2005-06-18 06:32:56 *Girl..: Sjiek :-P 2005-08-13 10:13:13
	N1 - SLR vs. shitty 1.3 MP P&S Cheap digital cameras just make people ugly! 2005-06-04 22:06:25 578x987, 248605 bytes film-vs-digital-01.jpg
	N10 - Olympus C5060WZ and Contax 2005-07-26 06:07:20 774x600, 196525 bytes film-vs-digital-10.jpg
	N12 - Painting Reproduction Total destruction of pixel-size detail on digital camera. Not talking about absolutely correct reproduction of color on the film (without any efforts) and crappy colors of the digital. 2005-12-25 05:12:28 599x635, 195377 bytes film-vs-digital-12-painting.jpg
	N11 - Film SLR with cheap lens vs. Canon EOS 300D 6mp film scan vs. 6mp DSLR. Definitely, digital shot looks quite sharp... until you put it side-by-side with film! Do not blame the Canon kit lens here - it's sensor and scanner limit resolution on the samples. It's definitely clear from such shots that resolution of ordinary 35mm film is far over than 6mp (at least by twice). 2005-12-25 05:12:33 824x974, 258582 bytes film-vs-digital-11-dog-sm.jpg
12